|
Almost everything we do these days generates a "carbon
footprint". The phrase comes from the fact that transport and manufacturing
and almost anything that uses electricity requires the burning of a fossil
fuel to generate that energy (internal combustion engines in lorries and
cars, coal and gas fired power stations for e.g.). As fossil fuels (coal,
oil and gas) are mainly carbon, so carbon dioxide is released in the process
- this is considered to be a bad thing as being a "greenhouse gas" it then
contributes to global warming.
You'll find plenty of lists of how to "save the world
in easy steps", and a lot of them are fiddly little things that it's
a problem to remember and sometimes a pain to do. There's also the fact
that some make a huge difference, others, while terribly worthy may be wiped
out by that light-bulb you forgot to turn off last night.
These are the biggies - that
make the largest difference, if you want to re-use supermarket bags
and earn a few loyalty card points as well even better, but if you don't do those listed here, you're not really
making much of an effort.
It comes down to reducing the amount of greenhouse gases
you are personally responsible for releasing. Some are obvious, drive a
car - carbon dioxide (CO2) comes out of the exhaust, some are
less obvious, buying just one new shirt instead of two that you don't really
need for instance saves on CO2 emissions in its production and
transport.
So here goes, roughly in some kind of order.
Isn't
that a bit militant? Well maybe it is Mr. Airline-Industry-Dependent-Man,
but flying is the one usually unnecessary
thing we do that can have the biggest immediate effect on greenhouse gas
emissions (CO2). Long-haul flights are the worst as they have
to carry extra fuel that in the early part of the journey that is needed
to carry the extra fuel that is needed in the later parts of the journey
- short-haul flights don't need to do that to the same extent.
So how bad is it?
A single long-haul return flight, say from the UK to Australia,
South America or the Far East can release about as much CO2 as
driving 15,000 miles in a fairly standard 1.6L car on your own (and yes
that is per person, you don't divide it by all the people on the plane).
The average annual mileage by a motorist in the UK is about 10,000, so one
long-haul airline round trip is the same as 18 months of normal motoring
- and wipes out an awful lot of eco-friendly bike-riding in a single stroke.
All of these thing produce about the same amount of
CO2
- 15,000 miles (18 months worth) of motoring in an
average size standard car
- 1 return long-haul flight e.g. UK to Australia, South
America or the Far East
- 3 return medium-haul flights e.g. UK to
East Coast America, Africa or India
- 6 return short-haul flights e.g. UK
to Europe
| Dump the 4 x4, SUV or Pickup - Get a More Economical (and
better) Car |
(Swallows
diplomacy pill) You can probably reduce your CO2 emissions
by at least a third by getting a far more fuel efficient vehicle.
An MPV will do pretty much the same job as an 4 x 4 for this saving
in fuel and emissions while giving a similar internal space, though
maybe not being so good at mounting a machine-gun on the back and
taking part in a limited regional armed conflict or hauling a whole
winter's worth of lumber from the back-woods - hands up who needs
to do those things?Relative CO2
emissions (approximate guide):
| The most fuel efficient "ECO" cars |
0.5 |
| Hybrid*
e.g. Toyota Prius |
0.61 |
| Supermini 1.2L or smaller |
0.70 |
| Supermini 1.2 - 1.6L |
0.88 |
| Family car 1.8L
engine or smaller |
1 |
| MPV 1.8L engine or smaller |
1.05 |
| Family car larger than 1.8L |
1.14 |
| MPV car larger than 1.8L |
1.2 |
| Coupe between 1.9 and 3L |
1.26 |
| Executive car 2.5L or less |
1.37 |
| Executive car larger than 2.5L |
1.6 |
| 4 x 4 / SUV 3L or smaller |
1.7 |
| 4 x 4 / SUV larger than 3L |
1.94 |
* Note
- while the Toyota Prius was the first commercially available
hybrid and amongst the least polluting production cars currently available,
there are a number of small engined petrol and diesel models
that are now less polluting than the hybrid Prius's emission levels. Also
- hybrid doesn't always mean low emissions, Lexus have
recently produced hybrid SUV's with 3.3 and 3.5L engines that
have emission levels far above many standard family petrol and
diesel models - but they get to say it's a hybrid and pretend
they're helping while they're not.
(Spits
diplomacy pill out) No-one really needs to drive around in something
the size of a small bus, safety considerations are negated
by the increased tendency of 4 x 4s to overturn in accidents
as they're top-heavy. So help the planet and get a better car
that can go round corners too and is far more fun to drive.
It's a little known fact that
other cars regard 4 x 4's and pickups as dorky idiot cousins
that it's an embarrassment to share genes with - ask any Alfa
Romeo or Prius of your acquaintance.
Car Fuel Data Site (UK) -
get the environmental data on all current cars
here
|
|
Get More Efficient Refrigeration
|
|
In
most homes, the single most energy-hungry appliance over the
year is the fridge. Buy the most energy efficient model
you can - it will be cheaper in the long run. Less efficient
models are usually less expensive to buy, though the initial
cost price difference is getting slimmer compared to the most
effective machines. The extra running cost of electricity of
cheaper models easily wipes out the initial cost-saving.
Energy efficiency is graded by
the letters A-G, with A being the most efficient.
If you need an extra freezer,
then get a chest freezer rather than an upright - they are significantly
more efficient. Open the door of an upright freezer and
all the heavy cold air falls out (hot air rises, so cold air
falls) to be replaced with warmer air which needs refrigerating
again when you shut the door, not to mention the cold air in
your kitchen which gives the central heating more work to do.
Chest freezers retain their cold
air when the lid is opened and they also usually have better
insulation than an upright - a much more effective choice in
every way.
|
|
Reduce Space Heating Requirements
|
The second largest energy user is frequently
the heating of a living or working environment. The scope for reducing
energy usage is less so than refrigeration, but still considerable.
Ways to do this:
-
Insulate roofs, ceilings, walls, windows and floors,
you may be able to get a grant to help you do this, ask
at your local council, government office or library.
|
- Use curtains on windows to keep the
heat in and shelves above radiators (about 2"/5cm above)
to deflect heat outwards rather than up under curtains where
radiators are so frequently placed and the heat is lost
in heating the window.
|
-
Turn the thermostat down
by 1 degree - 2 is even better! 1 degree Centigrade
will save around 10% of the energy needed and you probably
won't notice so much - if you're cold, put something on.
If you're cold and don't put something on it'll help you
lose weight as you generate heat from within by burning
up food instead!
|
- Keep doors and windows closed
as far as possible.
|
- Don't heat little used parts of the
house / workplace. Rarely or unused spare or guest rooms
for instance can have their heaters turned off and doors
closed when not in use.
|
|
Reduce Water Heating Requirements
|
|
One
of the easiest ways of doing this is to take
showers and not baths, though it is possible to use
an awful lot of energy in the shower too. Power Showers are
the worst culprits, normal showers are fine for getting you
clean. And don't spend so long in the shower.
More efficient washing machines
and dishwashers can have a large effect here too, so consider
paying a little extra at purchase time to save an awful lot
more in energy cost through the lifetime of the appliance.
|
|
Get More Effective Lighting and Use it Less
|
|
We're
all aware of energy efficient light-bulbs - effectively
short coiled fluorescent tubes that use a fraction of the
energy of an ordinary light bulb and last far longer too.
They are considerably cheaper over the life of the
bulb - so why aren't you using more of them, if you already
know this?
Maybe it's too obvious to say,
but turn lights off where they are not needed, the same goes
for all those appliances you leave on stand-by. BTW - exactly
when did "off" start to get replaced by "stand-by"?
|
For some reason I don't entirely understand,
all of the above often goes instantly out of the window when business
is concerned. Here's a few obvious ways that business can help VERY
considerably:
- 1/ Don't assume that it doesn't matter
as long as "it's business" - it does - you / they are
responsible. At the moment in many cases the polluter doesn't
pay, but in reality WE ALL PAY and the polluter is riding
on the backs of everyone else. "It's Business" is
not a no-blame joker-card, often the effort to improve may
be small and the effect large.
|
- 2/ Don't have doors open in the winter
with a fan heater blowing downwards above the entrance
so people can walk in but still feel nice and warm even
though the door is wide open. Doors are a very effective
low tech means of retaining heat and therefore cutting greenhouse
emissions - use them! (reduces fuel bills too - best described
as "overheads" sounds more impressive in corporate-speak!).
|
- 3/ You don't really need to have ALL
the lights on ALL night - timer switches will do the
job if you can't be bothered. You'll save on power bills
and also on the life-time of light fittings. Advertising
is just not going to be effective between about midnight
and 8 a.m. so turn it off!
|
- 4/ Office environments don't need
to be frigid in the summer. If you need to put something
on to stay warm when people outside are in t-shirts, then
the air-conditioning dial is in the wrong place.
|
-
5/ Encourage government
to help where you can and DO NOT SUPPORT WASTEFUL INDUSTRY.
An extreme example (November 2006) - A seafood
company in Scotland is planning to ship frozen langoustines from Scotland to Thailand
so that they can be peeled and then frozen and shipped back
again. Currently they are peeled using water jets, but this
isn't so great. A 12,000 mile trip to be peeled by Thai
workers earning 25p an hour instead will give a better quality
product for less cost. Each 1 tonne of fish will generate
0.5 tonne of carbon dioxide that wouldn't otherwise have
been released. But hey! they can make money from it and
that's all that matters isn't it?
|
|